Evaluate vendors with the same rubric every time.

Evaluating a new tool? Everyone on the team tries it and reports back with different criteria. One person cares about pricing, another about SSO, a third about API docs. You can't compare apples-to-apples because everyone filled in different shapes.

Real response comparison

Without AI

Three evaluators, three formats. One wrote a Notion doc, one sent a Slack message, one said "it's fine" in standup.

~5 min

With Pluck + AI

Three evaluators, same form. Each covers the same criteria with specific observations, making comparison straightforward.

~10 sec

How AI changes this

Structured fields ensure every evaluator covers the same ground. If the evaluator's AI has access to the vendor's docs, it can pre-fill pricing, auth support, and publicly available specs. The evaluator focuses on their hands-on experience and opinion. Pluck's probes push past "it's fine" to specific impressions.

How it works

1You create the form — add fields and follow-up probesyou

2Share the URL — drop it in Slack, email, or a docyou

3Respondent opens it in browser OR hands it to their AIthem

4Probes nudge shallow answers deeper — "can you be specific?"them

5Or their AI pre-fills from context (tickets, docs, conversations)AI

6You get specific, actionable responses in your dashboardyou

Example fields

Vendor name
Pricing (per seat, flat, usage)
SSO / auth support
API quality (1-5)
Setup time
Dealbreakers
Would you switch to this? (yes / maybe / no)
Notes

Follow-up probes

When an answer is too short, Pluck nudges the respondent to go deeper.

API quality

▸Did you hit any undocumented behavior?

▸How was the error messaging?

Dealbreakers

▸Is this a hard blocker or a strong preference?

▸Could a workaround exist?

Who this is for

Engineering leads evaluating tools, ops teams running procurement, anyone who compares vendors and wants structured feedback.

Try Pluck for vendor evaluation

Free to start. Create your first form in 2 minutes.