Retros that don't sound like they were written at 11pm on a Friday.

Your retro form gets 4 responses out of 12. The ones you do get say "went fine" and "nothing to change." People aren't disengaged — they're tired and the form is asking them to recall two weeks from memory.

Real response comparison

Without AI

"Fine. Some hiccups." (11:47pm, took 30 seconds)

~5 min

With Pluck + AI

Specific details about what shipped, what caused friction, and what to change — reviewed in seconds instead of recalled from scratch.

~10 sec

How AI changes this

If the respondent's AI has access to their work tools — PRs, tickets, Slack — it can pre-fill "what went well" with specifics from the actual sprint. The engineer reviews, tweaks, submits. Even without tool access, Pluck's follow-up probes push past "went fine" — asking "what specifically slowed you down?" until you get real signal.

How it works

1You create the form — add fields and follow-up probesyou

2Share the URL — drop it in Slack, email, or a docyou

3Respondent opens it in browser OR hands it to their AIthem

4Probes nudge shallow answers deeper — "can you be specific?"them

5Or their AI pre-fills from context (tickets, docs, conversations)AI

6You get specific, actionable responses in your dashboardyou

Example fields

What went well
What slowed us down
What should we change
Sprint rating (1-5)
Shoutouts

Follow-up probes

When an answer is too short, Pluck nudges the respondent to go deeper.

What went well

▸Can you be specific about the impact?

▸What made it work?

What slowed us down

▸How many days did this block you?

▸What would have prevented it?

What should we change

▸Who should own this change?

▸Have we tried this before?

Who this is for

Engineering teams, product teams, any group that runs sprints and wants retros worth reading.

Try Pluck for sprint retros

Free to start. Create your first form in 2 minutes.