Feedback collected while the event is still fresh.

You send the feedback form after the event. 20% fill it. The ones who do write "it was great!" which tells you nothing about what to repeat and what to cut. By the time you analyze it, you've already planned the next event the same way.

Real response comparison

Without AI

"It was great!" (from everyone who bothered to respond, which was 15 of 80 attendees)

~5 min

With Pluck + AI

Specific feedback on individual sessions, what to repeat, what to cut — from a much higher share of attendees because the form is fast to fill.

~10 sec

How AI changes this

Pluck's probes push attendees past "it was great" to specifics: "Which session stood out?" "What would you cut?" "What was the best use of your time?" If the attendee's AI has context about the event — sessions attended, schedule — it can jog their memory with details. You get signal you can act on for the next event.

How it works

1You create the form — add fields and follow-up probesyou

2Share the URL — drop it in Slack, email, or a docyou

3Respondent opens it in browser OR hands it to their AIthem

4Probes nudge shallow answers deeper — "can you be specific?"them

5Or their AI pre-fills from context (tickets, docs, conversations)AI

6You get specific, actionable responses in your dashboardyou

Example fields

Which sessions did you attend?
Best part of the event
What would you cut or change?
Speaker you'd invite back
Overall rating (1-5)
Would you attend again?

Follow-up probes

When an answer is too short, Pluck nudges the respondent to go deeper.

Best part of the event

▸What made it stand out?

▸Would you attend a full workshop on that topic?

What would you cut or change?

▸Was it the content, format, or timing?

▸What would you replace it with?

Who this is for

Event organizers, workshop facilitators, conference planners, community managers.

Try Pluck for event & workshop feedback

Free to start. Create your first form in 2 minutes.